Shubman Gill scored 110 runs in the first innings of Dharamshala test match.
Shubman Gill has made a brilliant comeback in the ongoing Test series against England. After the flop in the first test match, Shubman was on the verge of being dropped from the playing XI. But the team management decided to give him a chance in the second test match and then he scored a century in the second innings of that match and saved his place in the team.
After that century innings, Shubman Gill is looking in great form. He also scored a brilliant century in the fifth test match being played in Dharamshala. When Shubhman Gill scored a century in Dharamshala, his father was also present on the field and he looked very happy after seeing his son’s innings.
Meanwhile, his father Lakhwinder Gill has given a big statement regarding this century innings of Shubman Gill. During this, he also told that he was not happy with his son’s decision to bat at number one. Speaking to PTI, Shubman Gill’s father said that batting at No. 3 is a double-edged sword as it is neither an opening nor a middle-order position.
Shubman Gill’s father gave a big statement regarding batting at number three.
Lakhwinder Gill said that, “He should have continued opening. I think this is not correct at all. When you sit in the dressing room for a long time, the pressure increases. No. 3 is not opening nor is it a middle-order position.” However, since the second Test of the current series against England, Shubman Gill has played very good cricket.
This right-handed batsman has scored two centuries and two half-centuries in his last six innings. His father further said, “Stepping out of the crease to play the ball has made a lot of difference. The moment you don’t play your natural game, you get into trouble. “Since his Under-16 days, he has been playing forward shots against spinners and fast bowlers.”
He also said, “I do not interfere in his decisions. I only train with him. She is intelligent enough to take her own decisions. “I took decisions on his behalf when he was a child.”