Piyush Chawla has given this statement when Amit Mishra said that Virat Kohli has changed a lot as a person after getting money and power.
Former spinner Piyush Chawla has said that his relationship and friendship with Virat Kohli is still the same as it was 10 to 15 years ago. He also said that he still talks to Virat Kohli in the same way as he used to earlier.
Piyush Chawla has given this statement when Amit Mishra said that Virat Kohli has changed a lot as a person after getting money and power. Amit Mishra had said this in Shubhankar Mishra’s podcast that after becoming the captain of the Indian team, Rohit Sharma has remained the same as a person but Kohli has changed a lot.
Let us tell you, Virat Kohli is considered one of the best batsmen in the world and his performance is always very good. In international cricket, Virat Kohli has batted brilliantly in many important matches for India.
Piyush Chawla said in the same podcast, ‘We have played junior cricket together. Not only this, even today, if we both meet, we meet in the same way as before. If I have to say something to Virat, then I speak in the same way as I used to talk earlier. Everyone has their own thinking, but my relationship with Virat is the same as it was 10-15 years ago.’
Piyush Chawla made a big statement about bowling against Rohit and Kohli
Piyush Chawla was last seen playing international cricket for India in 2012. He has bowled to Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma quite a few times in the Indian Premier League.
Regarding this, Piyush Chawla further said, ‘I have dismissed both the players a few times but both of them have batted brilliantly against me. There can be no comparison in this, both have their own class. Virat Kohli will take a run on good balls and will also play big shots in between. Rohit Sharma will also hit hard against bad balls. Both have their own class and they bat in their own way.’
Players who scored most centuries in Tests between IND vs BAN-
List of players who scored most runs in the powerplay of T20I in 2024-
Ishan Kishan suddenly entered the Duleep Trophy and then scored a century
Players who have won the most “Player of the Match” in WTC-
Know how is Virat Kohli’s record in the test against Bangladesh?
Batsmen who hit the most sixes for India in the death overs of T20I
Batsmen who scored the fastest T20 century for Australia-
Mushir Khan broke Sachin Tendulkar’s 33 year old record
Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India
7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here-
AUS vs IND 2024-25: Umpire Simon Taufel made special comment on KL Rahul’s controversial DRS out in Perth Test
There is a special discussion in the cricket world regarding Rahul’s dismissal. Australia vs India, 1st Test (Image Credit- Twitter X) India is facing Australia in the first match of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy series from November 22 at the Optus Stadium in Perth. In the match, stand-in captain Jasprit Bumrah has won the toss and decided to bat first, which has not proved right for the team. However, there is a lot of discussion in the cricket world about the way experienced batsman KL Rahul was out in the match. After defending a lot of the ball, Rahul was slowly building his innings, but he was unfortunately given out in the 23rd over of the Indian innings. Mitchell Starc came to bowl this over of the Indian innings for Australia and in this over, he bowled the second ball of length to Rahul, which went very close to the bat. During this, other players including the bowler appealed, but the onfield umpire did not give the player out. But during this, captain Pat Cummins took DRS review and the third umpire gave Rahul out. But in UltraEdge it was clearly seen that the ball had hit the pad saved from the bat. On the other hand, now experienced umpire Simon Taufel has reacted to Rahul’s DRS out. Simon Taufel reacts to Rahul’s DRS out Let us tell you that Simon Taufel, while discussing with 7 Cricket about Rahul’s dismissal in the Perth Test, said – We saw in that side on shot that there was a spike on the RTS and the bat was away from the pad, in other words the bat. The lower part did not reach the pad. So rotating it in its natural course, you would have seen the second spike (on the sneako, to indicate the bat hitting the pad) come in more than if it had been rotated all the way. So former cricketer Matthew Hayden, who was commenting during this time, said – We are assuming that (Snikko) could be the outer edge of the bat, but it cannot be so. Well, the umpire’s decision is the final decision, and the player cannot protest against it. Due to this decision of the umpire, Rahul had to return to the pavilion after being out on the score of 26 runs in 74 balls.
Share this:
Like this: