DTVHINDISupreme Court dismissed the petition filed regarding cricketers in Mumbai, know the whole matter here
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL is not maintainable Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will take care of it themselves.” A double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and dismissed the petition while making a strong remark. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. While dismissing the PIL, the Supreme Court said this The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer, to which the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers
The petition filed in the Supreme Court regarding Mumbai cricketers was rejected, know the whole matter here
The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will look into it themselves.” The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and made a strict remark and rejected the petition. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. The Supreme Court dismissed the PIL The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer. To this, the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers
Jammu and Kashmir High Court cancels chargesheet filed against JKCA leader Farooq Abdullah and company
On August 14, the state High Court completely quashed the chargesheet filed by the ED. J&K Stadium (Pic Source-X) The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had filed a chargesheet against former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah and others in connection with the money laundering case of irregularities in the Jammu and Kashmir Cricket Association (JKCA). On August 14, the state’s High Court has completely quashed the chargesheet filed by the ED. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, who conducted the proceedings, said that the people who were accused had not committed any crime and hence the chargesheet was quashed. The ED had filed the chargesheet against National Conference chief Abdullah, Ehsan Ahmed Mirza, former treasurer of JKCA, Mir Manzoor Ghazanfar, and others. The ED had filed a chargesheet accusing the JKCA of misappropriating funds received from the Board of Control for Cricket in India. It was reported that Rs 94.06 crore was received in three different bank accounts during the financial years 2005-2006 to 2011-12. This is why Abdullah, Mirza Ghazanfar, former writer Bashir Ahmad Misgar, and Gulzar Ahmad Baig were accused by the JKCA of misappropriating funds worth Rs 43.69 crore. Following this, the ED filed a case against Abdullah and all others in 2018 citing a chargesheet filed by the CBI on the same allegations even though three separate orders were passed earlier. Moreover, the ED arrested Mirza in November 2019 on the basis of the chargesheet and his case is still going on. Our petition has been accepted, ED had no jurisdiction over the case: Shariq J Riaz Mirza and Ghazanfar were represented by Shariq J Riaz as they approached the high court seeking quashing of the case filed by the ED. Additional Solicitor General V Raju argued on behalf of the ED and the order was reserved for August 7. However, Reyaz has confirmed that ‘our argument is that no wrongdoing was committed.’ The court’s decision has been negotiated in his favour. Apart from this, he has also revealed that the ED had no jurisdiction over the said case. This is the real status of Pakistan..! Match tickets are being sold for peanuts This player has won the most “Player of the Series” awards The coach had caught hold of Sehwag’s collar, Veeru got furious and then… Anjali’s mother considered Sachin Tendulkar a ‘PLAYBOY’ and then… Top 5 batsmen who scored the most runs for India since 2020 5 Australian players who scored half-century in their debut IPL match IPL 2024: These 11 foreign players took crores of rupees but flopped IPL 2024: 5 players who hit the most sixes in the 19th and 20th overs of IPL 5 fastest bowlers in IPL history Who are the head coaches of all 10 teams in IPL 2024?
Not even a day has passed since he became the advisor of Pakistan Cricket Board that a petition has been filed against Waqar Younis, know what is the whole matter?
PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi has recently appointed Waqar Younis as the cricket advisor of the board. Waqar Younis. (Photo credit ARIF ALI/AFP/Getty Images) Legal challenges have arisen over the appointment of former fast bowler Waqar Younis as advisor to Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Mohsin Naqvi. A Pakistani citizen named Mashkoor Hussain has filed a petition in the Lahore High Court, questioning the validity of the appointment. This petition is being represented in the court by a lawyer named Nadeem Sarwar, as the petition states that the necessary protocols have not been followed in the process for the appointment of Younis. Along with this, the petition also mentions irregularities in the processes of appointment of Gary Kirsten as the white ball coach of the Pakistan men’s team and Jason Gillespie as the red ball coach. According to the petition, the appointment of Waqar Younis is completely illegal because the Pakistan Cricket Board did not publish any advertisement regarding this in the newspapers. Regarding this, Mashkoor Hussain says that the appointment of Waqar Younis should be cancelled. Waqar Younis gave a big statement On the other hand, after becoming the cricket advisor of the Pakistan Cricket Board, a big statement has come from 52-year-old former cricketer, captain and coach Waqar Younis. Let us tell you that after his appointment in PCB, Younis said, quoting Cricket Pakistan- We will appoint five veterans to lead the teams and I am already in touch with some of them. The current state of cricket is clear, reforms are necessary. Although stadiums are important, our focus should be on raising the quality of the game. It is important to involve famous cricketers and legends in this process. The chairman’s suggestion to include these personalities is good. We have discussed with some former legends. We will soon announce the names of those who will help take the game forward.
Yuvraj, Harbhajan and Raina had to pay heavily for making fun of handicapped people, FIR filed against all three players
World Championship gold medallist para badminton player Manasi Joshi said the video sets a very bad example. Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh and Suresh Raina (Image Credit- Twitter/X) India Champions defeated Pakistan Champions by five wickets in the final of World Championship Legends and won the trophy of this great tournament. After the match, India Champions players Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh and Suresh Raina celebrated the victory in the dressing room in such a way that now an FIR has been registered against all three players. Actually a video was going viral on social media in which it could be seen that Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh and Suresh Raina were walking like handicapped people. After this video came on social media, many people said that all three legendary players have made fun of handicapped people. In the video, Yuvraj Singh, Harbhajan Singh and Raina are seen limping and holding their backs, which shows the physical toll the match has taken on their bodies. Now Indian para athletes have accused former cricketers of making fun of the disabled. World Championship gold medalist para badminton player Manasi Joshi said that this video sets a very bad example. Amidst the growing controversy over the video, Harbhajan Singh clarified on ‘X’ and said that his intention was not to insult anyone. Arman Ali, President of the National Center for Promotion of Employment for Disabled (NCPEDP), has accused Instagram-owned Meta of violating the Information Technology Act 2000 by posting such content in the complaint. FIR filed against Yuvraj Singh, Suresh Raina and Harbhajan Singh Armaan Ali wrote that, ‘This whole act has been done under the guise of casual entertainment. We also want to file a complaint against Sandhya Devanathan, Vice President and Managing Director of Matter India as this platform is also violating the Information Technology Act 2000, as this platform is violating 2000 by allowing such content to be posted on their platform, Instagram. The video violates Article 21 of the Constitution of India which gives every individual the right to life with dignity and also violates Section 92 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016.’ 5 Australian players who scored half-century in their debut IPL match IPL 2024: These 11 foreign players took crores of rupees but flopped IPL 2024: 5 players who hit the most sixes in the 19th and 20th overs of IPL 5 fastest bowlers in IPL history Who are the head coaches of all 10 teams in IPL 2024? Which team has won the most matches against RCB in Chinnaswamy IPL 2024: 3 former RCB players who are wreaking havoc in SRH 4 players who have played more than 500 T20 matches MS Dhoni: Dhoni’s amazing record as CSK captain Which teams changed their captains before the start of IPL 2024
Bengaluru Police takes action against Virat Kohli’s pub, FIR filed for violating rules
(Photo Source: X) Team India’s star cricketer Virat Kohli seems to be in trouble. Bengaluru police have filed an FIR against Virat Kohli-owned One8 Commune Pub and several other establishments on MG Road for operating beyond the stipulated time. According to DCP Central, the pubs were found open till 1.30 am while their closing time is 1 am. DCP Central has said, ‘We have taken action against the pub which was operating till 1.30 am. We had received a complaint about loud music being played. Pubs are allowed to remain open only till 1 am, not beyond that.’ The police took action after receiving complaints of loud music being played late at night in the area. The pubs booked for violating the rules also include One8 Commune Pub located near the Chinnaswamy Cricket Stadium. “We have also received a complaint about loud music being played at night. Investigation is on and further action will be taken accordingly,” the police officer said. Virat Kohli’s restaurant has often been in the news for some reason or the other Apart from Bangalore, Kohli’s one8 commune is also in Delhi, Mumbai, Pune and Kolkata. According to media reports, the Bangalore branch was started in December last year. It is located on the 6th floor of Ratnam Complex. Last year, a controversy erupted after a man from Tamil Nadu shared a video on X about how he was denied entry into the Mumbai branch of the One8 commune for wearing a ‘veshti’ (a kind of lungi often worn by South Indian men). The man said the behaviour left him ‘disappointed’ and ‘sad’. This restaurant chain owned by Virat-Kohli was also in the news last year when the Delhi High Court had stopped One8 Commune from playing songs which are copyrighted by Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL).
