DTVHINDISupreme Court dismissed the petition filed regarding cricketers in Mumbai, know the whole matter here
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL is not maintainable Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will take care of it themselves.” A double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and dismissed the petition while making a strong remark. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. While dismissing the PIL, the Supreme Court said this The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer, to which the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers
The petition filed in the Supreme Court regarding Mumbai cricketers was rejected, know the whole matter here
The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will look into it themselves.” The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and made a strict remark and rejected the petition. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. The Supreme Court dismissed the PIL The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer. To this, the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers
Not even a day has passed since he became the advisor of Pakistan Cricket Board that a petition has been filed against Waqar Younis, know what is the whole matter?
PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi has recently appointed Waqar Younis as the cricket advisor of the board. Waqar Younis. (Photo credit ARIF ALI/AFP/Getty Images) Legal challenges have arisen over the appointment of former fast bowler Waqar Younis as advisor to Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman Mohsin Naqvi. A Pakistani citizen named Mashkoor Hussain has filed a petition in the Lahore High Court, questioning the validity of the appointment. This petition is being represented in the court by a lawyer named Nadeem Sarwar, as the petition states that the necessary protocols have not been followed in the process for the appointment of Younis. Along with this, the petition also mentions irregularities in the processes of appointment of Gary Kirsten as the white ball coach of the Pakistan men’s team and Jason Gillespie as the red ball coach. According to the petition, the appointment of Waqar Younis is completely illegal because the Pakistan Cricket Board did not publish any advertisement regarding this in the newspapers. Regarding this, Mashkoor Hussain says that the appointment of Waqar Younis should be cancelled. Waqar Younis gave a big statement On the other hand, after becoming the cricket advisor of the Pakistan Cricket Board, a big statement has come from 52-year-old former cricketer, captain and coach Waqar Younis. Let us tell you that after his appointment in PCB, Younis said, quoting Cricket Pakistan- We will appoint five veterans to lead the teams and I am already in touch with some of them. The current state of cricket is clear, reforms are necessary. Although stadiums are important, our focus should be on raising the quality of the game. It is important to involve famous cricketers and legends in this process. The chairman’s suggestion to include these personalities is good. We have discussed with some former legends. We will soon announce the names of those who will help take the game forward.
