Agenda of BCCI Supreme Council meeting: 8 major issues will be discussed
The meeting is being held five days before the upcoming 93rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Bengaluru A view of logo of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) (Photo by Aniruddha Chowhdury/Mint via Getty Images) The Apex Council meeting of the BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India) will be held on Wednesday, in which many important issues related to the functioning of the board will be discussed. However, even though Jay Shah has resigned from the post of BCCI secretary to take over as ICC (International Cricket Council) chairman, the issue of appointment of a new BCCI secretary is not included in the agenda, The meeting is being held five days before the upcoming 93rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) in Bengaluru, and will be the last meeting of the Supreme Council before the AGM. Despite Jay Shah being elected ICC President, a new BCCI Secretary has not been appointed yet. What is the agenda of the BCCI Supreme Council meeting? Jay Shah will attend the upcoming AGM as BCCI secretary, as he will take over as ICC president from December 1. Eight major issues will be discussed on the agenda of the meeting, with the nomination process or the appointment of a new secretary not being discussed. The payment dispute with former title sponsor Byju’s will also be discussed on the agenda of the meeting. Byju’s ended its sponsorship agreement with the BCCI last year, and now there is a dispute over the outstanding payment in the matter. Byju’s case included in the agenda Bengaluru-based edtech company Byju’s, co-founded by Ravindran Byju, had signed a three-year jersey sponsorship deal with the BCCI in 2019. The deal was extended by a year for an amount of $5.5 million. While payments were made till September 2022, the dispute is over the outstanding payments from October 2022 to March 2023. An update on this dispute will be part of the agenda of the meeting. Discussion on National Cricket Academy The meeting will also discuss the opening of a new state-of-the-art National Cricket Academy (NCA) outside Bengaluru. Currently, the NCA is functioning in the M Chinnaswamy Stadium complex, which is more than two decades old. Along with this, the issue of renovation of the exterior of the BCCI headquarters in Mumbai and approval of the North-East Development Project will also be discussed in the meeting.
Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed regarding cricketers in Mumbai, know the whole matter here
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL is not maintainable Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will take care of it themselves.” A double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and dismissed the petition while making a strong remark. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. While dismissing the PIL, the Supreme Court said this The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer, to which the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers
The petition filed in the Supreme Court regarding Mumbai cricketers was rejected, know the whole matter here
The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Supreme Court of India (Photo for representation purpose only.) (Photo Source: Twitter) The Supreme Court today, on September 6, dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking toilet facilities for cricketers in all stadiums in Mumbai. A division bench of Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih has also questioned the petitioner’s right to file a PIL in this matter. A bench of Justices AS Oka and AG Masih said, “What kind of PIL is this? If there are no toilets for cricketers, they will look into it themselves.” The double bench of the Supreme Court (SC) was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer. Which was settled by the High Court in June last year. However, when the lawyer approached the Supreme Court to take his PIL to a conclusion, the judge expressed concern over the crowd of cases and made a strict remark and rejected the petition. In his PIL, the lawyer had sought directions to the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to provide drinking water and other facilities to the players during practice or informal matches on public grounds. The Supreme Court dismissed the PIL The Supreme Court said, ‘Just look at the pictures you have attached. These very grounds of Mumbai have given the greatest cricketers to the country…’ The bench also asked the petitioner whether he is primarily a cricketer or a lawyer. To this, the petitioner replied, ‘I am a lawyer.’ Hearing this, the bench said, ‘What kind of appeal is made in the PIL? You want toilets to be made available to cricketers in various grounds of Mumbai.’ The apex court said, ‘The Bombay High Court was right in its decision that the PIL is not admissible for hearing.’ Concluding the hearing, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s decision that the PIL was not maintainable, stressing that the issues raised did not call for judicial intervention and were better dealt with by the concerned sports bodies themselves. Wicketkeepers with most Man of the Match awards for India 7 expensive watches of Hardik Pandya and their prices, know here- Virat Kohli has earned more than 8 billion rupees in the last 12 months List of teams scoring the most runs in the power play of T20- Rahul Dravid became rich after becoming the head coach of Rajasthan Royals These 5 Indian cricketers pay the highest tax, you will be shocked to know the amount Haris Rauf’s wife is extremely beautiful, even Bollywood actresses fail These 7 captains have clean swept Pakistan in their own home Shubhman Gill betrayed Sara, was seen with this beauty Anushka-Ritika fail in front of the wives of these 5 Pakistani cricketers